Multichannel Success Podcast series
Episode 5 - Trading Effectiveness - Transcript
#### David Kohn
Hello, and welcome to our podcast series on how to drive multi-channelsuccess.
I'm David Kohn, founder of The Multi-Channel Expert, and I'm here today with David Worby and Mark Pinkerton of Prospero Commerce, one of the leading independent digital consultancies in the UK.
A warm welcome to both of you, David and Mark. Hello. Hi. In this podcast series, we've been exploring a range of issues that you and your business are faced with every day. The three of us have many, many years of experience and expertise working for and with retail and customer brands, and we brought this together to come up with a set
of practical suggestions and ideas that will help you deliver greater success
in your e-commerce business. We really hope you find our discussions useful,
and we look forward to your feedback. In today's episode, we're going to
explore the subject of trading effectiveness. I'd like to start by asking you
both, what do you mean by trading effectiveness?
#### David Worby
I think for me, this slightly unusual category called trading effectiveness is simply to try to get a measure of your output relative to your input in terms of results. We all know the climate of today is challenging and businesses more than ever are examining how much they're
spending and what resources they're utilising to drive the results they
expect. And this category is something that we felt passionate about, would
give businesses a measure of how effective they're being at driving the kind
of results they expect. And that can be done at a campaign level, but it can
also be done if you roll it up at the very top line business level. So it's a
true measure of whether you've got one person in your team or 101 people in
your team, whether or not you're driving the kind of results you would expect,
benchmarked against your competitors.
#### Mark Pinkerton
And at a practical level, we're talking about trading for the digital channels
that you have as a business, not the offline channels, although the
interrelationship with them will come too.
#### David Kohn
Thank you. Now, that sounds to me like just day to day work. What is it that
makes you say that it's particularly important now? Has it changed over the
last few years? Why the focus on this subject?
#### David Worby
I think getting more from less is an increasingly important subject,
particularly for retailers and for brands as well. Trying to ensure that every
ounce of energy or budget or resource you spend is delivering against your
expectations. And as business owners, you deserve to understand the results of
those efforts and energies. And sometimes it's about technology, sometimes
it's about people, sometimes it's about skills, but ultimately if you're
ploughing resources into a business in order to grow it, whether that's
growing sales or growing profits, you need to understand the correlation
between that input value and the output you get against your expectation. And
it comes in many forms, and I'm sure we'll talk about them. There's onsite
optimization, whether it's marketing or merchandising, there's data in terms
of product. We'll talk about all those subjects, I'm sure, later. But at the
top level, it's about giving business leaders the opportunity to understand
that if I plough in 10% more effort, what energy results do I get at the back
end of my organization?
#### Mark Pinkerton
And at a holistic level, I think, you know, it is pretty much about e-commerce
growing up. We've gone through many years of being a natural growth for
e-commerce, you know, pick a number, 10, 20, 30, 40 percent a year, being a
natural growth rate, to the last couple of years when actually minus eight
isn't too bad a result post-COVID. And that has changed the mentality
associated with e-commerce. So, you know, e-commerce has become more important
to businesses, maybe as they've closed shops, but actually as a result of the market
expansion in digital. And that has changed the way that you can look at these
things from an overall business point of view. It is now more important simply
because digital has become a greater part of the total.
#### David Worby
And I think extending that point, we come to the concept that businesses that
were formed as offline businesses that became digital for whom Mark has said
now become dominantly digital, the tools that are now available in order to
optimize your business are very different from the tools that existed when you
were principally an offline business. So the tools that existed, I think, when
I was in retail 30 years ago, were generally strategic tools. On a Monday
morning, we woke up, we discovered three new things we needed to do that we
didn't really have to renew last week. And they were blunt instruments. They
were generally about price, they were generally about promotions, they were
generally about product. But today's world is so much more complex than that.
And e-commerce and digital has data that allows many, many, many more
incremental decisions to be taken, sometimes without human intervention that
give you the opportunity to optimize your business. So it becomes more about
marginal gains and less about big, clunky, Monday morning strategic decisions.
#### David Kohn
Yeah, that's very interesting, David. And what you're talking about there is
more of a philosophy, if you like, than an actual set of actions. which is relentless improvement, always looking for change. Are you also looking at a change in what you might have called a top down approach to trading, which would have been driven typically
by the buyers or the product merchandisers to maybe something that's a little
more bottom up or a little more channel specific?
#### David Kohn
Is that something you're seeing?
#### Mark Pinkerton
Yeah, very much so. And I think, as you say, it is bottom up, looking at the
data that covers everything. And we'll come on to data measurement in a little
bit. But there are many more points of data available to somebody doing a
merchandising role or a trading role. And the nature of that trading role has
really changed over the years. So that actually having somebody who is
effectively an optimization engineer within the sphere of trading is probably
the right skill set or capability that somebody, an organization now needs
going forward, rather than somebody who is a product merchandiser.
#### David Worby
or indeed, whose experience qualifies them to make strategic decisions. And I
think today, as you pointed out, those incremental micro decisions are
collectively more powerful than some of those traditional senior leadership
decisions that were often made on gut instinct, experience of the past
sometimes than than they were then. So I think the world of work has changed
in that sense. And the people that have the data are not the CEO. And
therefore, the people who are empowered to make decisions are not the CEO. And
organizations that empower their individuals who have the right data and can
make the right decisions are arguably in a stronger position than those exist
from the top down.
#### Mark Pinkerton
Yeah, and so you're right, it's very much an inverse way of looking at an
organisation. And it's not unusual within the digital world for that to be the
case, but it is new, relatively new within the merchandising sphere. And we
have done a number of programmes over the years where I can say with a
reasonable degree of certainty that by automating and using systems and tools
to do the job, rather than gut instinct, there will be, you know, at least a
20% improvement of performance through using a piece of technology.
#### David Kohn
Fabulous. Well, thank you for that. And I think just to reiterate what David
said, I think we're all aware of the HIPPO principle, the highest paid
person's opinion. The only time in my experience that was correct was when I
was the highest paid person. Now, obviously you started to touch on day-to-
day, you started to touch on questions. I know you guys are doing a lot of
work with multi-channel companies, with e-commerce businesses. Where do you
start? What are the sort of questions that you're asking these businesses to
try and get a picture of where they are and what they need to do?
#### David Worby
Yeah, that's a good question. Because our model is built on sharing of data,
asking of questions to all the relevant individuals. And as a subject within
our eight sector wheel, trading effectiveness has questions around it that
allow us to get under really two things. One, how mature is the organization
in using technology to allow good trading decisions to be made? And secondly,
how naturally curious is the organization in wanting to know something in
order to be able to optimize it? And I'll give you a couple of examples. One
of the questions that we love to ask is, what analysis have you done of your
online returns? And how does that compare with your offline returns? Now,
there's three parts to that question. The first is, do you know what your
online return reasons for returns are? And some people do, and some people
don't. Do you know what your offline reasons for returns are? And there's less
people know the reasons for offline returns, for obvious reasons. And then
thirdly, have you done any correlation? So if someone's able to tell us that
they understand the reasons for online returns, and they understand the
reasons for offline returns, and their analysis suggests these are the points
of difference, and these are the hypotheses as to why, you know they're in a
fairly mature state in terms of being curious about what's going on. And
that's the best position on which to determine future actions.
#### Mark Pinkerton
Yeah, and we were talking before offline about the situation that a fashion
retailer would have with bodycon dresses, where they might have a 40 or a 50%
return rate in store, but online an 80% returns rate is not that unusual. And
in that case, for that category of product, it may well be just a better
customer experience and a better trading decision to emphasize the fact that
the customer can try the product on in store, which will take cost out of the
entire process as far as the retailer is concerned.
#### David Worby
One of the other questions I know Mark particularly likes, but I'll just
outline it and he can maybe talk a little bit about it, is do you trap
availability? Do you understand availability? You probably understand demand,
but do you understand lost demand, i.e. opportunity that you're not taking
advantage of, and what reporting is in place to give you that sense? I know
that was something you were interested in.
#### Mark Pinkerton
Yeah, so the availability one is one that I've worked on in the past, whereby
you can track the viewed availability of a product on a product details page on a website, so
that if there is fragmented stock available of that product, you've got five
sizes for making the math easy, you've got five sizes and two of those sizes
are out of stock, then you actually only have an availability of 60% of that
product. And it is possible to set up your analytics to track that every time
the page is viewed, and then correlate that with the conversion rate of that
product. So you get a very clear view of the impact of availability on product
sales, and very few retailers do that.
#### David Worby
Very And let's not forget that if you're a customer who wants the size that's
unavailable, you are 100% unavailable.
#### Mark Pinkerton
Correct and also if you are a size medium and you go to that product and that size is
not available that is just not going to get tracked because there's no
interaction with the page that would track you unless you have like Bowden
always used to do on their fashion website where you have my sizes and
therefore a product is not presented if it isn't available in your size.
#### David Kohn
Thank you both. Those are really good examples. What I like about the approach
is it's helping you to get an understanding of the performance itself but also
to understand the organization mentality and almost their natural curiosity
for trying to get underneath the skin of the statistics and understand why
things are happening. Now let's move it on a little bit here and look at some
of the aspects of trading and trading effectiveness that you would look to
optimize. I guess one of the first things or the main things is the funnel,
the customer journey, is trying to get your customers to get from their first
interaction with the business through all the way to basket and checkout. Why
don't you talk about some of the areas that you would be looking at if you
were looking at a client?
#### Mark Pinkerton
Yeah, well, the first area would be around marketing optimisation. So how
effective is the organisation at spending its money to drive traffic to the
website? And clearly, the cost of Google, either specific product or generic
terms, the cost of Google is going up constantly and the returns involved are
generally dropping. We know that e-comm conversion rates have dropped this
year. However, at a practical, pragmatic level, there's a degree of de-duping
needed across the various parts of the organisation to make sure that you're
not offering both an overall campaign and a special offer simultaneously. So
it's not that unusual. but you de-dupe that, but again you don't want to offer
too many conflicting messages to customers at a time. And the other one is to
make sure that the promotional calendars that you have, both from an overall
brand strategic level but then also from the more tactical product-led
promotions and then website-based promotions, don't conflict with each other.
So you need quite a well-tiered promotional calendar visibility within the organization to make that work and that has to be available to everybody from marketing director or
e-commerce director all the way down to the individual traders and
merchandisers.
#### David Worby
We tend also to think in the marketing optimisation world that
those organisations, and it's a generalism, so it's kind of true mostly, but
not necessarily always, that those who see a delineation between customer
acquisition and customer retention tend to be slightly more sophisticated in
how they tackle it, simply because in one sense you're doing a very different
thing from what you are in the other. Customer retention's a very different
skill from customer acquisition. And blindly trying to acquire customers that
you, to Mark's point, will have to de-dupe you already own is a foolish
pursuit, and it ends up costing huge amounts of money. So one of the things we
will do is try to help you work out the degree to which you are retaining
customers, and therefore, consequently, the degree to which you need to
recruit them in order to hit your sales targets.
#### David Kohn
Yeah, I mean, my guess would be that many of the digital marketeers listening
to us are all about optimization. It's one of the areas that's probably more
ripe for development would be the whole area of on-site merchandising, what
do you put on the website, what you put on your PLPs, what's on your product
pages. What do you think the audience can learn about these areas that would
be of use to them?
#### David Worby
Well, this is where I think there's good news for merchandisers, because the
world of optimising product listing pages has moved on tremendously. And there
are a huge plethora of tools available, whether they're embedded within your
platform, whether they're bolt-on applications that you can acquire to
effectively turn your page into an algorithm-driven world. Having said that,
I'm still very surprised how many businesses we talk to who still insist on
having all the red dresses together and then all the green trousers together.
That still is a requirement for some businesses, but the vast majority who've
now drunk the Kool-Aid I think have moved into a world of being able to say
the engine can do a better job than any human can do, and on-site
merchandising can be algorithm-driven rather than driven by an individual.
#### David Kohn
One of the questions I've got, maybe Mark can pick this up, is what are the
sort of measures, what are the metrics that on site merchants should really be
focusing on to try and improve performance?
#### Mark Pinkerton
Well the classic sort of analysis that I've been involved with in the past is
one where you're looking at the efficacy of each product, and it may be across multiple product pages, product details pages depending on the structure and nature of the
site, is to look at the number of times a product has been viewed versus the
number of times the product has been bought and then you can map that out on
effectively a two by two matrix and then you can end up with a whole bunch of
products where you either need to drive more traffic to it because they
convert very effectively, or the opposite of that would be actually to have a
whole bunch of products where they don't convert therefore they they're
performing much worse than the rest of the site and you have to look
individually properly at those products and look to improve them in some way
and work out is it product imagery is the product description because let's
face it the template of the overall page is not one that's going to differ
across PLPs or PDPs.
#### David Worby
But I think this is an area of the website that has advanced much more, as I
said before, in terms of technology. So here I would expect you to be more
curious to explore tools that can help optimise the success rate of a customer
arriving on a PLP and then clicking on a PDP. Clearly the goal here is to get
customers to look at product detail pages and then add to bag. But if you
strip it back, it's trying to move from a PLP to a PDP. And I think advanced
organisations have now set targets for individuals who manipulate the
algorithms and drive the algorithms to set targets for them in terms of the
degree to which their customers can do that. In the old days, it was a bit
layout and hope. These days it's a much more active pursuit with tools that
even prevent people clicking on the X button or the back browse button. There
are ways of you ensuring that you achieve a higher level of click through to
the next stage than ever has been true in the past.
#### Mark Pinkerton
I wouldn't honestly approve of removing the ability to press a back button but
there's dark patterns that would fall into in my book. But very much, you
know, these tools now can access lots of data sources across the organisation.
So we're talking search and merchandising tools where they can be
algorithmically driven but they will, you know, unlike a human which will
probably take in two or three different sources of data to make a decision
about the layout of a PLP and, you know, if you're doing that manually and you
decide like one of our previous clients has done to change the order of the
PLP at three o'clock in the afternoon every day and that is a manual process,
that's an awful lot of work for nothing. Whereas if you have an
algorithmically driven tool, that change should happen automatically a number
of times through the day. But also they go from taking two or three data
sources to being able to include, you know, an understanding of current trends
and changes of those, best selling performance, promotional activity,
inventory levels, margin levels, weather, all of those sorts of things can
then start to get played into the mix which means you get a much more sophisticated output.
#### David Kohn
Excellent. I mean, Mark, I know one of your passions as well, and one of the
things you see as a big driver of trading effectiveness is the quality of the
product data that you're able to surface to the customer. There's quite a few
dimensions to this, I guess, but what do you see happening in this area? Do
you see it improving?
#### Mark Pinkerton
Yeah, I think both going back to the bottom-up, top-down analogy, I think at a
more sort of strategic level, there's been a change in the levels of the
organisation responsible for product data. I mean, historically, the econ team
used to have to get their hands dirty because it was the way to make the
website work, but now you're getting with tools like product information
management tools, PIM tools, you're getting process flow with stage gates set
in them so that if a product doesn't meet the required standards, it doesn't
get published to the website and therefore the merchandiser will get told, you've got 10 products this week that haven't met the criteria. they haven't gone live. Therefore,
they have to go and sort them out. So you ensure the quality of what goes live
in the first place.
#### David Kohn
And I guess speed to websites is also...
#### Mark Pinkerton
Oh absolutely and one of the questions we always ask
is how quickly can you publish a product to the website from when it comes
into the warehouse because that tests a number of different systems in the
background but it you know it I think the fastest we've seen is about 10 or 15
minutes and the slowest is you know somewhere in the region about three weeks.
#### David Kohn
I could probably show you slower than that, but let's not go into that right
now.
I'd like to switch a little bit here. I mean, one other aspect of trading
effectiveness is how you manage your channels. Now, many of the people
listening to this will be trading through multiple channels. They could be on
Amazon, they could be on eBay, could be on Next. How have you gone about
looking at how a business optimises the way it trades through its different
channels?
#### David Worby
I think if you wind the clock back a bit, maybe five years ago, the effort was
100% trying to achieve retailing through different channels. It was about the
process of doing it. That took everybody's effort. That took everybody's
energy. It wasn't easy. It was cumbersome. There were tools to help, but they
weren't particularly helpful. And I think what that did is it relegated the
important subject that is about the nature of customers and the different
groups of customers that exist in different channels. So if the effort was
100%, let's just expose our catalog to Amazon or to Flipkart or to one of
these other third-party businesses, then that's where your effort went. Today,
identifying differential catalogs as a result of differential customer
profiles is where the optimization world cuts in. So your customers on your
website are unlikely to mirror the customers on Amazon. So understanding the
dynamics of Amazon, and there are plenty of tools that they will provide you
with and share you with if you ask enough times, to finesse the catalog and to
some extent, for some businesses, the prices that are relevant in that
channel. So it's another version of your world, but with different customer
groups, with different expectations. You all know, using Amazon example, it's
a very fast, almost browse-free world. It's a one-button checkout. It's quick,
it's fast, it's zooming. That's often not what retailers think of their own
website to be. It's more of immersive experience where their brand is the
center of the universe. That defines the fact that customers are going to be
different and their expectations are different and you need to treat them
differently.
#### David Kohn
One of the questions I'm interested in and this may be a little difficult to
answer but how do you measure things like cannibalisation? Surely if you're
selling something through Amazon and you're selling the same product on your
own website, surely you're going to cannibalise. How do you measure things
like this? Well, I mean, historically I've done that.
#### Mark Pinkerton
I mean historically I've done that in a very simple way which is to say you
know assuming the products don't go live simultaneously then you can look to
see if when it goes live on Amazon assuming it's gone live on your own website
first which would be what we would always recommend but if the product has
then gone live on Amazon how has that affected your own website sales and okay
taking one product in isolation you might not come to any conclusions but when
you do that over a portfolio of a range then you can get a reasonable view of whether or not
cannibalization has occurred and we have had clients in the past where we
have thought there would be cannibalization but the data absolutely does not
prove hypothesis disproved.
#### David Worby
Differential ranging is one of the ways around it, but on the basis that a lot
of catalogue is core, particularly for brands, you do want Amazon to be
selling the same things as you. Mark and I have had
this experience at least twice, to kind of tell a story of the home of the
brand. There are many things that Amazon will never be able to do for a brand,
treat it in the way that the brand owner wants it to. But equally, we've seen
some really bad examples where businesses take their catalogue, give it to
Amazon, and assume that just because they've got their catalogue, the job is
now done. We would recommend that you identify the unique nature of your own
business and boost that. Amazon will never be the home of the brand, because
the only brand it's the home of, is Amazon.
So make your website the home of the brand.
And if customers who want the rich, immersive experience of your
brand are true to it, they will come to you. Amazon will be an expedient,
quickly satiated thing, but if they actually want to really immerse themselves
in all of the elements of your brand, whether it's your great product
information, whether it's your great content, whether it's your great warranty
service, whether it's your fantastic return service, make those your USPs,
which is unlikely to ever be the USP of an expedient business like Amazon.
#### Mark Pinkerton
But I would also argue that you don't necessarily want to put all of your
bestsellers onto Amazon because that does risk some cannibalization and if
you don't do all of them then at least you've got a comparison that you can
look at to see whether or not all of your best-selling products are being
cannibalized or not. Sorry I was going to say but also you've got individual metrics that Amazon offers like owning the buy box which gives you
a very clear view of how well you're doing versus other people who are selling
your product, particularly products or brands that go via wholesale route as
well.
#### David Kohn
I suspect channel strategy is a subject that could occupy an entire podcast,
and we may come back to it later in the series. I'd like to move on slightly
here. I guess people listening to this maybe think, well, this all sounds a
little tactical. How much difference does it really make? You know, what if
the brand I'm working for is going backwards? What if the pricing strategy is
wrong? What if the product range isn't right? I mean, how does all of this
feed into those strategic questions that really do need to be addressed?
#### David Worby
Well, it's a really good question. I've personally always been of the view
that your digital business can almost do everything for you. It can test
almost anything you want to test. So in extremis, if your brand is suffering
with potentially a pricing problem, its prices are too high, it isn't really
very difficult to establish an alternative route to market under the same
brand and experiment with pricing. Experiment is the important word. I'm not
suggesting you change everything on your global website to be 10% cheaper
tomorrow, but you can experiment with geo-regions, you can experiment with
certain parts of the world, you can experiment with certain parts of the UK,
if that's relevant to you, to understand the impact, the net impact of
bringing prices to a new level. You can also do that with ranging. So, you
know, many of you will have online exclusives, albeit that that's only ever
going to be 10, 20, 30% of the range. You can experiment with that in a way
that gives you a sense of what would happen if your business became that.
#### Mark Pinkerton
Yeah, and similarly you can actually use a website as your endless aisle so
you can have a much greater range available on the website because actually
stocking or listing more products doesn't really cost you any more. And there
are clients that we've worked with in the past where there have been products
that have outlived their usefulness in stores which have gone on selling
online for several years as a result because, okay, it's a dwindling audience
but it's still material enough to warrant having the product listed.
#### David Worby
So I think if your business has at its heart a kind of natural curiosity and a
thirst to learn more, putting the web to use in a variety of more strategic
ways will help you do it. I remember a slightly connected story when I was at
Harrods a few years ago. Harrods were clearly concerned about the negative
consequence of opening a second store. The first store is what it is, it's the
only store, there aren't any others. So we were very active in using the web
in other parts of the world to understand the extent to which there was
thirst, demand or interest for some of the brands that Harrods sold. And that
was a very risk-averse way of dipping our toe into the market and certainly
much more risk-averse than opening another green and gold store and finding
that it damaged the mothership.
#### David Kohn
Yeah, nice. I think what you're describing there is almost like a digital as a
strategic spearhead, somewhere where you can do things that are far more
difficult to do through other channels, a slightly less charitable way of
recording it, the budgie in the cage, where you can really test things. And
that leads on to my next question, which is, how does this affect the people that work in digital? Does it mean they've got a wider role? Does it mean they've got a role of more influence? Does it change the sorts of jobs that we do? What do you think about the impact on the organisation here?
#### Mark Pinkerton
I think that it has changed or if it hasn't changed in many organisations
it needs to change. And you know it doesn't actually matter whether we're
talking retail or whether we're talking a brand owner because the problem
is true at a CPG level as well. the merchandisers or the people who buy, sell,
create the product effectively now have to take ownership of the sales of
their product or service through not only the retail store but also through
the website and that's a fundamental change. They've kind of offloaded that
responsibility onto the econ team who then ran online merchandisers because
they understood the technology but now people have grown up with digital
sufficiently that that should no longer be that sort of split within the
organisation and as David said earlier you're going from merchandisers who are
there to make it look nice, put this dress next to this pair of boots, a point
where actually they're becoming the optimisation engineer for their range of
products. I mean you look at Amazon and we've used it as an example of
merchandising but they will have one person merchandising up to a million
product lines and the algorithm and the machine is what you know implements
their decisions. Now for a brand where you're being the home of the brand
clearly you want to curate things a lot more closely but what you're going to
end up doing is controlling and managing the algorithm that the search and
merchandising tool that presents the products to consumers is able to display
in the right order the right product.
#### David Worby
And I think if you, a slightly more strategic level, if you kind of chart back
the evolution of retail from being product-led businesses to being arguably
brand-led businesses, and I think the kind of current nirvana is a kind of
customer-led business, then the notion of seeing your business in its
component parts is less relevant than seeing it as a journey for a customer.
And the best place for that is online because you can map that journey. You
can see it from start to finish. And I think the engineer's role is to ensure
that the customer can move seamlessly from this page, that page, that page.
They can follow the ‘scent of information’ and they understand it and it's
logical. There are no barriers in the way. And that kind of customer focus
follows. And I think those that are maybe slightly more progressive than
others will see that journey as their success. If you can make that journey
easy and simple from start to finish, then you are likely to have less sticky
pages, sticky in a negative sense, and you're likely to have a better
net result. And you're likely to be more efficient in your trading
effectiveness.
#### David Kohn
Very nice. Well, that's a good place to almost finish. You've got one more
task in this session, and that is to try and come out with the one gem that
our listeners should take away.
#### Mark Pinkerton
The one thing that I would take away from this is that there is a plethora of
data available to you to do analyses of what's going on and to try and do that
analysis in a more I'm not sure strategic is the right way, but in a more
intelligent way than many organisations have done so far. But then also being
able to have confidence in the systems that you should have in play, whether
it's a PIM or whether it's a search and merge tool, or both, that then allows
you to actually implement the decisions that you take.
#### David Worby
Well, my point was going to be also around the top-down, bottom-up, but I'll
switch it to not forgetting the true nature of your organisation, i.e. we're
teaching a story here or preaching a story here about the use of technology
and the conversion of traditional jobs into engineering. For some businesses,
that is too far away from the very DNA that they have. And that's not a bad
thing. I think what you have to do is you have to take this and apply it in a
way that's logical to the nature of your business. Don't try and bet the cart
tomorrow that this can be your way of working if it never has been so far. I
think you've got to use it intelligently and use elements of it that are
relevant, not try and swallow it all whole.
#### Mark Pinkerton
So you mean if you've got a very creative lead brand that you don't want to go
down to the data engineering route because it's just not applicable to the
brand.
Explore it and experiment but don't bet the shop on it. So it comes back to
being an appropriate home for the brand. Well thank you.
#### David Kohn
Well, thank you. I really like the comment you made earlier about e-commerce
growing up. I think this podcast has demonstrated how e-commerce is growing
up, the sort of impact it can have on your organisation and some of the
specific things that you could be focusing on.
Many thanks to both Mark and David, and I hope you join us for our next podcast.